KATH v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN R. CO.

No. C5-88-1825.

441 N.W.2d 569 (1989)

Eileen M. KATH, individually and as Executrix of the estate of Robert L. Kath, deceased, Respondent, v. The BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 27, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Polk, Hertogs, Fluegel, Sieben, Polk, Jones & Laverdiere, Hastings, for respondent.

E. Scott Savage, Michael F. Richman, David L. Arrington, Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, Salt Lake City, Thomas W. Spence, Megan K. Ricke, Thomas W. Spence Law Office, St. Paul, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and FOLEY and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Respondent Eileen Kath sued appellant Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Burlington) for the wrongful death of her husband, Robert Kath. The jury found Burlington had been negligent under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. A. § 51 et seq. (1986) (FELA), and had violated the Federal Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 23 (1986). Burlington's post-trial motions were denied and it appeals.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases