TAYLOR v. SHEEHAN

No. C9-88-1259.

435 N.W.2d 575 (1989)

Karen TAYLOR, Respondent, v. James D. SHEEHAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 24, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Boivin, Meshbesher, Singer & Spence, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Robert A. Brunig, O'Connor & Hannan, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and NIERENGARTEN and LESLIE, JJ.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Three weeks after signing a contract to purchase appellant James Sheehan's auto parts telemarketing business, the respondent, Karen Taylor, notified Sheehan of her intention to rescind the contract on the grounds of fraud and substantial failure of consideration. Taylor sued for a judicial declaration of the rescission, and Sheehan counterclaimed for the balance of the purchase price and for amounts due under a lease. Taylor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases