1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 441 N.W.2d
  5. 441 N.W.2d 565 (1989)
 

KARNES v. MILO BEAUTY AND BARBER SUPPLY

No. CX-89-82.

441 N.W.2d 565 (1989)

Nan Mary KARNES, Respondent, v. MILO BEAUTY AND BARBER SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., d/b/a The Milo Corporation, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary L. Huusko, St. Paul, for respondent.

James P. Wilkins, John E. Holcomb, Millisor & Nobil, Akron, Ohio, Susan L. Segal, Lynn B. Noland, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Heard, considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and FOLEY and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Milo Beauty & Barber Supply Co., Inc. (Milo) and James Maddox appeal the jury's finding that statements written by Maddox defamed Nan Karnes. There was no motion for a new trial. We reverse.

FACTS

Nan Karnes was hired by Milo as a manager-trainee in January 1982. After four months of training, Karnes was appointed store manager of Store 190. Milo fired Karnes on March 30, 1984.

During her managerial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases