HARVEY v. STANLEY

No. 2-89-091-CV.

783 S.W.2d 217 (1989)

J. Dan HARVEY, M.D., and J. Dan Harvey, M.D., P.A., Appellants, v. Dorothy Louise STANLEY, Glenda Jean Briscoe, William Allen Stanley, Jr., Rhonda Athey, and Janice Gillman, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

September 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard U. Simon, McLean, Sanders, Price, Head & Ellis, Fort Worth, R. Brent Cooper, Michael W. Huddleston, Cowles & Thompson, Dallas, for appellants.

R. Jack Ayres, Jr., Julie Kay Baker, Amy S. Harris, Thomas V. Murto, III, Dallas, for appellees.

Before JOE SPURLOCK, II, KELTNER and MEYERS, JJ.


MEYERS, Judge.

Appellees Dorothy Louise Stanley, Glenda Jean Briscoe, William Allen Stanley, Jr., Rhonda Athey, and Janice Gillman (plaintiffs below), pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 49, sought leave of this court to review the sufficiency of the supersedeas bond set by the trial court. As we find no evidence that posting the supersedeas bond in full will irreparably harm appellants, the reduction privilege afforded by TEX.R.APP.P. 47(b) is not available to appellants. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases