HARTMAN v. WICK

Civ. A. No. 77-2019.

678 F.Supp. 312 (1988)

Carolee Brady HARTMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles Z. WICK, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

As Amended January 29 and February 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce A. Fredrickson, Susan L. Brackshaw, and Bonnie A. Suchman, Webster & Fredrickson, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Robert E.L. Eaton, Jr. and Stuart H. Newberger, Asst. U.S. Attys., Lorie J. Nierenberg and Richard H. Swan, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Information Agency (of counsel), on brief, Joseph E. DiGenova, U.S. Atty. and Royce C. Lamberth, Asst. U.S. Atty., for defendant.


                                      Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________________ page 319

I.    THE NEW LAW SET FORTH BY THE UNITED STATES COURT
      OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN PALMER
      V. SHULTZ MAY NOT BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN THIS
      CASE _______________________________________________________________________ 319

II.   THE OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES AT ISSUE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases