Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that his guilt was not established by legally sufficient evidence because the People did not prove that he knowingly possessed stolen property (see, Penal Law former § 165.50). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant knowingly had constructive possession
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
