1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 702 F.Supp.
  5. 702 F.Supp. 285 (1988)
 

HAWTHORNE v. WASHINGTON METRO. AREA TRANSIT AUTH.

Civ. A. No. 88-0359.

702 F.Supp. 285 (1988)

Carl W. HAWTHORNE, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen L. Joseph, Kline & Joseph, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Thomas A. Medford, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is a motion by defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff Carl W. Hawthorne has opposed the motion. For the reasons articulated below, this action will be dismissed.

I.

Defendant WMATA is a governmental entity established by means of a Compact entered into between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases