DOE v. WATERTOWN SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Civ. A. No. 88-1240-Y.

701 F.Supp. 264 (1988)

Liebe DOE, Plaintiff, v. WATERTOWN SCHOOL COMMITTEE and Acton School Committee, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 13, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew McGinnis, Belmont, Mass., for plaintiff.

John C. Bartenstein, Ropes & Gray, Boston, Mass., Roger Randall, Town of Watertown, Watertown, Mass., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

Pursuant to 20 U.S.C. sec. 1415(e)(4), the plaintiff, Liebe Doe ("Doe"), seeks to recover reasonable attorney's fees as well as the expert evaluation and witness fees which she incurred during her successful administrative challenge of the Individualized Education Plan ("I.E.P.") that the Watertown School Committee ("Watertown") had designed for her son, Ira. In 1985, Doe received a favorable disposition from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases