The order of the County Court should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for a review of the facts (see, CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]).
County Court held below that the foundation evidence attesting to the proper working order of the breathalyzer was inadmissible because the attached authentication certificate was improperly dated. This conclusion was error. Where a "certification...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
