1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 763 P.2d
  5. 763 P.2d 179 (1988)
 

STATE v. HOWELL

87-CR-503, 87-CR-514; CA A45650.

763 P.2d 179 (1988)

93 Or.App. 551

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Robert HOWELL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 26, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied January 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Dennis R. Ingram, Grants Pass, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Ingram & Rich, Grants Pass.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RICHARDSON and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence. The primary issue is whether the supporting affidavit contains sufficient facts to establish probable cause for issuance of certain search warrants.1 We conclude that the affidavit is sufficient and reverse.

The warrants were based on an affidavit by Detective Durbin, which sets out his training, experience and knowledge of indoor marijuana growing operations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases