GUZMAN v. SAKS FIFTH AVE. CORP.


141 A.D.2d 801 (1988)

Ernesto J. F. Guzman, Respondent, v. Saks Fifth Avenue Corp. et al., Defendants, and Otis Elevator Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Denham Food Service, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 27, 1988


Ordered that interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

We find that the evidence supported the jury verdict finding Otis at fault and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. A jury may infer negligent inspection and repair in the maintenance of an elevator from evidence that the hoistway doors automatically opened in the absence of the elevator cab, and the interlock system, which was designed to prevent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases