CARR v. MELMARKETS, INC.


143 A.D.2d 795 (1988)

Louise Carr et al., Respondents, v. Melmarkets, Inc., Doing Business as Foodtown, et al., Defendants, and Progresso, a Division of Ogden Food Products Corp., et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 17, 1988


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs served responses to the appellants' interrogatories within the time prescribed by a conditional order of preclusion. Although the appellants purportedly rejected the responses as inadequate, Supreme Court was not required to grant the appellants' subsequent motion for summary judgment (cf., St. Agnes Hosp. v Dengler, 131 A.D.2d 657

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases