CONEYS v. GAME


141 A.D.2d 795 (1988)

Brian Coneys, Appellant, v. Cathleen Game et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 27, 1988


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

We disagree with the determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, that the defendant seller acted within her rights in canceling the contract (cf., Kramer v Palnagio, 128 A.D.2d 842, 843; Lieberman v Pettinato, 120 A.D.2d 646). The mortgage contingency clause was solely for the benefit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases