1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 693 F.Supp.
  5. 693 F.Supp. 242 (1988)
 

BAKSALARY v. SMITH

Civ. A. No. 76-429.

693 F.Supp. 242 (1988)

Richard J. BAKSALARY, et al. v. Paul J. SMITH, et al. In re Paul L. SABATINE v. CITY OF ERIE and Bureau of Workers' Compensation.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

August 10, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Goodman, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Michael Fetzner, Erie, Pa., for City of Erie.

Carl Vaccaro, Philadelphia, Pa., for Bureau of Worker's Compensation.

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Paul Sabatine, alleges that defendant, Erie, failed to provide him with a Baksalary special supersedeas hearing in accordance with the Baksalary Consent Decree (approved in Baksalary v. Smith, 591 F.Supp. 1279 (E.D.Pa.1984)). The Consent Decree requires class defendants to provide special supersedeas hearings for class plaintiffs whose workers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases