NORTHAMPTON CTY. DRAINAGE DIST. v. BAILEY

No. 876SC1204.

373 S.E.2d 560 (1988)

92 N.C. App. 68

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NUMBER ONE, Plaintiff, v. Larry Donald BAILEY, Jr. and wife, Maxine Spence Bailey; Betty Gatlin, Unmarried; Claude M. Fennell and wife, Brenda D. Fennell; Thomas L. Redd and wife, Connie B. Redd; Jesse B. Outlaw and wife, Dessie B. Outlaw; William Slade and wife, Kathleen Slade; James M. Bush and wife, Dorothy W. Bush; Thomas David Tann and wife, Vernear O. Tann; Jesse Lee Eason and wife, Lily M. Eason; Lucius Cornell Slade, Unmarried; Whallon Holloman and wife, Sawyer Holly Holloman; James O. Buchanan, Trustee for Farmer's Home Administration, lienholder; Joseph J. Flythe, Trustee for the Federal Land Bank of Columbia, lienholder; Thurman E. Burnette, Trustee for Farmer's Home Administration, lienholder; Joseph J. Flythe, Trustee for John M. Fields, lienholder, Defendants, and Manning P. Cooke, Agent, Robert Darrell Morris, John Southgate Vaughan, Phillip B. Parker and John D. Snipes, Jr., Intervenor-Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 15, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank M. Wooten, Jr. and Browning, Sams, Poole & Hill by Robert R. Browning, Greenville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Baker, Jenkins & Jones by Ronald G. Baker, Ahoskie, and Charles J. Vaughan, Woodland, for defendant and intervenor defendants-appellees.

Geo. Thomas Davis, Jr., Swan Quarter, for Hyde County Drainage Dist. No. 7, amicus curiae.

Mayo & Mayo by William P. Mayo, Washington, for Beaufort County Drainage Dist. No. One (Pantego Creek Drainage Dist.), Beaufort County Drainage Dist. No. Two (Broad Creek Drainage Dist.), Beaufort County Drainage Dist. No. Five (Albemarle Drainage Dist.) and Beaufort County Pungo Drainage Dist. No. One (Pungo River Drainage Dist.), amicus curiae.

Atty. Gen. Thornburg by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. Daniel C. Oakley and Asst. Atty. Gen. Philip A. Telfer, Raleigh, for the State of N.C., amicus curiae.


EUGENE H. PHILLIPS, Judge.

All the foregoing rulings by the court are challenged by plaintiff's appeal and we will discuss them in the order stated.

I.

We see no constitutional infirmity in G.S. 156-81(a) and (i) permitting the Clerk of Superior Court of Northampton County to either appoint the commissioners of this two-county drainage district or provide for their election by the landowners as he sees fit, and the court's ruling to the contrary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases