FED. SAV. BANK v. BUYOKAS


141 Misc.2d 785 (1988)

Columbia Federal Savings Bank, Plaintiff, v. Carol Buyokas, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Queens County.

November 16, 1988


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Halpern, Halpern, Axelrod, Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P. C., for plaintiff. Carol Buyokas, defendant pro se.


ARTHUR W. LONSCHEIN, J.

This application to punish the judgment debtor for contempt presents the novel question of whether the movant can introduce a fatal defect into his papers by giving the respondent too much advance notice. For the reasons stated below, the court concludes that too much notice is just as fatal as too little, and denies the motion without prejudice.

Procedure on a contempt motion is governed by Judiciary Law § 756, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases