1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 844 F.2d
  5. 844 F.2d 81 (1988)
 

WILSON v. RUFFA & HANOVER, P.C.

No. 357, Docket 87-7357.

844 F.2d 81 (1988)

Kenneth J. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUFFA & HANOVER, P.C., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided April 12, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy P. Butler, New York City (Robert E. Meshel, D'Amato & Lynch, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Jonathan B. Altschuler, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TIMBERS, WINTER and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether proof of loss causation is an essential element of an action under Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77l (1982), when the defendant is a collateral participant in a securities transaction and not an actual seller. The law firm Ruffa & Hanover appeals from a judgment, entered after a trial before Judge Sprizzo, holding it liable under Section 12(2) for having prepared...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases