1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 167 Ill.
  5. 167 Ill. App.3d 758 (1988)
 

HAUK v. DAY

Nos. 3-87-0278, 3-87-0279 cons.

167 Ill. App.3d 758 (1988)

521 N.E.2d 1243

CATHERINE L. HAUK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOHN H. DAY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Appellate Court of Illinois — Third District.

Opinion filed April 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murvel Pretorius, Jr., of Quinn, Johnston, Henderson & Pretorius, and Kevin M. Miller, of Goldsworthy, Fifield & Hasselberg, both of Peoria (Karen Kendall and Paul Gilfillan, of counsel), for appellant John H. Day.

Gary M. Peplow and Elizabeth W. Christensen, both of Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, of Peoria, for appellant Narendra K. Gupta.

Raymond C. Rose, of Raymond C. Rose, Ltd., James E. Shadid, and Cusack & Fleming, P.C., all of Peoria (Michael A. Fleming, of counsel), for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE STOUDER delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, Catherine L. Hauk and Jeffery Hauk, filed a complaint against the defendants, John H. Day and Narenda K. Gupta, alleging medical negligence. Pursuant to the healing art malpractice provision (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2-622), the plaintiffs attached an affidavit to the complaint stating that the statute of limitations was about to run and that the plaintiffs were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases