1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 851 F.2d
  5. 851 F.2d 69 (1988)
 

HAGEMAN v. CITY INVESTING CO.

No. 1090, Docket 88-7120.

851 F.2d 69 (1988)

Arthur G. HAGEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY INVESTING COMPANY and the Home Insurance Company, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur G. Hageman, New York City, pro se.

Cynthia A. Epstein, New York City (Martin D. Heyert, Kelley Drye & Warren, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, MESKILL and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Arthur G. Hageman, pro se, brought this appeal in a consolidated action from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Broderick, J., granting in part and denying in part the motion for dismissal and/or summary judgment of defendants-appellees City Investing Co. and the Home Insurance Co., et al. We hold that the order, which did not dispose of all of the claims in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases