MATTER OF NASTRI v. MICHEL


71 N.Y.2d 846 (1988)

In the Matter of Jan Nastri, Respondent, v. Ann Michel et al., Constituting the Planning Commission of the City of Syracuse, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Frank Harrigan, Corporation Counsel (Eleanor Theodore of counsel), for appellants.

Robert D. Ventre for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum.


MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Planning Commission reinstated.

When reviewing an application for a subdivision, the Syracuse Planning Commission is empowered to impose higher planning and design standards than otherwise provided in the local regulation where "[it] finds that because of exceptional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases