Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner claims that he was denied due process of law because of the error of the parole authorities in citing the incorrect numbers of the conditions of release which the petitioner was charged with violating. The petitioner further claims that the Administrative Law Judge presiding over the final parole revocation hearing failed to make findings of fact and to state the reasons for revoking...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
