1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 840 F.2d
  5. 840 F.2d 72 (1988)
 

WILLIAMS & HUMBERT LTD. v. W. & H. TRADE MARKS

No. 87-7025.

840 F.2d 72 (1988)

WILLIAMS & HUMBERT LIMITED v. W. & H. TRADE MARKS (JERSEY) LIMITED, Jose Maria Ruiz-Mateos, et al., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 23, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Amend, with whom Jeffrey S. Davidson, David G. Norrell and Steven M. Wellner, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Jack C. Berenzweig, Chicago, Ill., with whom John D. Nies, Arlington, Va., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying an application for intervention under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellants contend that the order of the District Judge denying their application was not supported by the record. We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases