GENDEN v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH

No. 85 Civ. 7928 (WCC).

700 F.Supp. 208 (1988)

James GENDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 7, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meites, Frackman & Mulder, Chicago, Ill. (Thomas R. Meites, Lynn Sara Frackman, Michael M. Mulder, of counsel), Zavin, Sinnreich & Wasserman, New York City (Richard Wasserman, of counsel), for plaintiffs.


OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:

Plaintiffs James K. Genden and Alma Koppedraijer ("the Gendens") brought this securities class action against Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith ("Merrill Lynch"), alleging that Merrill Lynch failed to disclose that mortgage subsidy bonds contained in Municipal Investment Trust Funds ("MITFs") it marketed were subject to the possibility of special mandatory early redemption. According to the Gendens...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases