DENZER v. FRISCH

No. C7-88-871.

430 N.W.2d 471 (1988)

Wayne L. DENZER, et al., Appellants, v. Donald FRISCH, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 18, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald W. Benson, Benson & Merchlewitz, Winona, for appellants.

James H. Turk, Blethen, Gage & Krause, Mankato, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and NORTON and HACHEY, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appeal is taken from an award of summary judgment wherein the trial court found appellants Denzer collaterally estopped from bringing suit against respondents Frisch. Appellants entered a Pierringer agreement with the plaintiff in a prior action which had been brought against both appellants and respondents. When appellants subsequently sued respondents for damages, the trial court found appellants had been in privity with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases