PEOPLE v. THOMAS


138 A.D.2d 760 (1988)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Thomas, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 28, 1988


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The identification of the defendant by the witness Hudson had a sufficient basis independent of the photographic identification, namely, Hudson's observation of the defendant's face at the time of the crime and his recollection of having seen the defendant in the neighborhood (see, People v Scatliffe, 117 A.D.2d 827, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 1056; People v Johnson,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases