Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The identification of the defendant by the witness Hudson had a sufficient basis independent of the photographic identification, namely, Hudson's observation of the defendant's face at the time of the crime and his recollection of having seen the defendant in the neighborhood (see, People v Scatliffe,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.