Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court improperly admitted into evidence the substance of conversations between an undercover police officer and a coconspirator. Declarations by a conspirator made during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy are admissible against a coconspirator as an exception to the hearsay rule provided that the prosecution establishes a prima facie case of conspiracy independent of the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.