COPPINGER v. METRO-NORTH COMMUTER R.R.

No. 80, Docket 88-7334.

861 F.2d 33 (1988)

Ronald COPPINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided November 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul T. Hofmann, New York City (Phillips Cappiello Kalban Hofmann & Katz, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Mary Ann Mills, New York City (Karen Timko, Walter E. Zullig, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before CARDAMONE and PRATT, Circuit Judges and TENNEY, District Judge.


CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from a dismissal of plaintiff's complaint presents the single legal issue of whether a district court has jurisdiction to hear a discharged employee's claim for damages and equitable relief in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, even though the discharge has been upheld in compulsory and binding arbitration pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. (1982) (RLA).

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases