1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 765 P.2d
  5. 765 P.2d 126 (1988)
 

BADELL v. BEEKS

No. 16821.

765 P.2d 126 (1988)

115 Idaho 101

Michael C. BADELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul M. BEEKS, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Rehearing Denied December 30, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crist & Barsotti, P.A., Ketchum, for plaintiff-appellant. Roger E. Crist argued.

Elam, Burke & Boyd, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Jeffery J. Ventrella argued.

BISTLINE, Justice.

This case against attorney Paul Beeks was the aftermath of an unsuccessful malpractice action against a dentist, Michael Badell, which Mr. Beeks brought on behalf of the dentist's patient, one Vaughn Hicks. In a summary judgment hearing, Dr. Badell sought dismissal on the basis that Hicks had failed to establish the applicable standard of care in malpractice actions, citing I.C. § 6-1012, through an expert witness. The district court, the Hon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases