Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress the statements she made to law enforcement officials, as most of those voluntary statements were not the product of custodial interrogation, and those that were the product of custodial interrogation were made after the defendant was informed of her rights in accordance with Miranda v Arizona (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.