1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 699 F.Supp.
  5. 699 F.Supp. 171 (1988)
 

U.S. v. SHAW

No. 88 CR 334.

699 F.Supp. 171 (1988)

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Robert SHAW, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

November 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anton R. Valukas, U.S. Atty. by Sheila Finnegan and Barbara Lazarus, Asst. U.S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Robert D. Seeder, Michael T. Mason, Federal Defender Program, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

The indictment in this case charges defendant with two separate bank robberies. This court denies defendant's motion to sever Counts One and Two of the indictment. By charging defendant with the same type of offense, each of these counts will require the government to prove the same elements. The Seventh Circuit has concluded that this type of similarity justifies joinder under Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases