KIRSHNER v. STATE

No. 88-1446.

533 So.2d 322 (1988)

Jack R. KIRSHNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 10, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack R. Kirshner, Raiford, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellees.


ORFINGER, Judge.

The trial court erred in summarily denying the indigent appellant's motion for post-conviction relief with respect to his claim that costs were imposed upon him without adequate notice and opportunity to be heard. The record supports appellant's contention. Costs may not be assessed without notice or an opportunity to object. Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988); Mays v. State,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases