KADANE v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY

No. 85 CV 2652.

682 F.Supp. 166 (1988)

David K. KADANE, Plaintiff, v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

Opinion on Reargument February 22, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ressa, Nappi & Weinig by Harvey Weinig, Port Washington, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Baer Marks & Upham by Stuart H. Bompey, Jill L. Rosenberg, New York City, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Both plaintiff and defendant move this Court for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Each party contends that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that each is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Following submission of briefs by both sides and oral argument on the motions of July 10, 1987, the Court requested oral testimony to clarify several questions of fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases