BANNING TEACHERS ASSN. v. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

Docket No. L.A. 32300.

44 Cal.3d 799 (1988)

750 P.2d 313

244 Cal. Rptr. 671

BANNING TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, CTA/NEA, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; BANNING UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Real Party in Interest.

Supreme Court of California.

March 7, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charles R. Gutafson, Kirsten L. Zerger, A. Eugene Huguenin, Jr., and Rosalind D. Wolf for Petitioner.

Jeffrey Sloan and Martin Fassler for Respondent.

Stewart Weinberg, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, James P. Jackson, City Attorney (Sacramento), and William P. Carnazzo, Deputy City Attorney, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Ronald C. Ruud, Karen E. Gilyard and Tina L. Kannarr for Real Party in Interest and as Amici Curiae on behalf on Respondent.


OPINION

PANELLI, J.

We granted review to consider whether a parity or "metoo" agreement between a school district and its classified staff violates the provisions of sections 3545 and 3543.5 of the Government Code.1 Specifically, does a parity agreement violate subdivision (b)(3) of section 3545, requiring that classified and certificated employees not be included...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases