Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in denying that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony, as the evidence adduced established the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of suggestiveness of the identification procedures. Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no evidence adduced at the suppression hearing that certain wanted posters issued more than one month...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
