OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his sentence enhancement as an habitual offender. The sole issue on appeal is whether a prior conviction used to enhance defendant's sentence for fraud was valid. We reverse.
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of fraud over $100 but not more than $2,500, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-6 (Repl.Pamp. 1984). No appeal was taken from that conviction. Thereafter, the state filed a supplemental...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
