1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 747 S.W.2d
  5. 747 S.W.2d 92 (1988)
 

QUIGLEY v. STATE

No. CA CR 88-64.

747 S.W.2d 92 (1988)

295 Ark. 167

David QUIGLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Arkansas, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 28, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Clark, Batesville, for petitioner.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for respondent.

MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, David Quigley, by his attorney, David M. Clark, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this court. See Ark.R. App.P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases