1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 701 F.Supp.
  5. 701 F.Supp. 134 (1988)
 

MACURDY v. SIKOV AND LOVE, P.A.

No. C82-3811Y.

701 F.Supp. 134 (1988)

Tom E. MACURDY, Plaintiff, v. SIKOV AND LOVE, P.A., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

September 20, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Ruffalo, Dudley B. Ruffalo, Hilton Head Island, S.C., for plaintiff.

Seymour A. Sikov, Pittsburgh, Pa., and Jack R. Baker, Baker, Meekison & Dablikar, Canton, Ohio, for defendants.

ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

Before this Court is Defendant's motion for summary judgment. This motion turns on the law concerning attorney fee arrangements but a review of the facts of the case at bar is required.

Plaintiff Macurdy lived in Ohio, but close to the border of Pennsylvania. He was licensed to practice law in both states and, in fact, had client matters in each jurisdiction. The genesis of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases