1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 136 A.D.2d
  5. 136 A.D.2d 699 (1988)
 

WARSHAW v. CARLIS REALTY CORP.

136 A.D.2d 699 (1988)

Joel Warshaw et al., Appellants, v. Carlis Realty Corp. et al., Defendants, and Madeline Trupiano, Doing Business as Madeline Individual Eyelashes & Waxing, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 25, 1988

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as against the moving defendant for lack of prosecution (see

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases