HINKEL v. UNITED STATES

No. 86-1517.

544 A.2d 283 (1988)

Ronald A. HINKEL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 27, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas K. Clancy, Washington, D.C., appointed by the court, was on the brief, for appellant.

Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Michael W. Farrell, Patricia A. Riley, and Odessa F. Vincent, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BELSON and TERRY, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.


BELSON, Associate Judge:

Convicted by jury of distribution of a controlled substance (heroin) in violation of D.C. Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1987 Supp.), appellant raises two contentions on appeal: (1) that his conviction must be reversed because the prosecutor, in closing argument, compared the credibility of police officer witnesses with the credibility of a defense witness who had been convicted of several crimes, and (2) that the trial court erred in denying his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases