1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 373 S.E.2d
  5. 373 S.E.2d 445 (1988)
 

STATE v. FULTZ

No. 8818SC123.

373 S.E.2d 445 (1988)

92 N.C. App. 80

STATE of North Carolina v. David FULTZ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen. Philip A. Telfer, Raleigh, for the State.

Tharrington, Smith & Hargrove by Roger W. Smith, Wade M. Smith and Melissa H. Hill, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant brings forward five issues on appeal. He argues that these convictions should be reversed because the indictments were insufficient to inform him of the nature of the charges against him. Alternatively, he contends that this court should grant him a new trial because the trial court erred in joining all of the offenses for trial, admitted certain incompetent evidence, and excluded competent evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases