1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 756 P.2d
  5. 756 P.2d 57 (1988)
 

MATTER OF COMPENSATION OF LUCAS

WCB 85-08631; CA A45786.

756 P.2d 57 (1988)

91 Or.App. 522

In the matter of the Compensation of Edward D. LUCAS, Claimant. Edward D. Lucas, Petitioner, v. Donald H. CLARK and Saif Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Christine Chute, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and GRABER, J., and RIGGS, J. Pro Tem.

PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that affirmed the referee and upheld the denial of his aggravation claim for a back condition. We review for substantial evidence. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7) and (8). Because neither the Board order nor the referee's opinion and order which it affirmed are adequate for judicial review, see Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases