1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 368 S.E.2d
  5. 368 S.E.2d 442 (1988)
 

STATE v. DILLARD

No. 8729SC1241.

368 S.E.2d 442 (1988)

STATE of North Carolina, v. Joe Haywood DILLARD.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen. D. David Steinbock, Raleigh, for the State.

Carnes and Franklin by Hugh J. Franklin, Marion, for defendant-appellant.

SMITH, Judge.

Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. First, he contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to quash the indictment. Second, he assigns error to the State's use of leading questions during the direct examination of the victim. Defendant's third assignment of error is that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss at the close of the evidence. Fourth, he assigns error to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases