1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 364 S.E.2d
  5. 364 S.E.2d 444 (1988)
 

BLOW v. SHAUGHNESSY

No. 8710SC153.

364 S.E.2d 444 (1988)

Elizabeth BLOW, et al., v. Jeffrey John SHAUGHNESSY et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 2, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrell & Wright by Bernard A. Harrell and I. Clark Wright, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hunton & Williams by David Dreifus and James E. Farnham, Raleigh, for defendants-appellees-Wheat First Securities, Inc., W. Larry Ownley and Lee Folger, III.

No brief filed, by defendant Jeffrey John Shaughnessy.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in giving a supplemental jury instruction on the definition of "substantial assistance." We find plaintiff's contention is without merit.

Plaintiffs object to the following language given by the Court:

Substantial assistance is defined as a large amount or quantity of assistance as distinguished from nominal or routine assistance. Assistance may be said to be substantial when it was a significant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases