Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court abused its discretion in permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine her based upon information elicited during her court-ordered psychiatric examination of fitness (see, CPL 730.20 [6]). The testimony in question was elicited without objection and, thus, the contention is unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, any error in that regard does not warrant reversal as a matter...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
