PHILLIPS, Judge.
Of defendant's numerous contentions one is moot, as well as fanciful and far-fetched—that his constitutional rights were abridged by being required to state in purging himself of civil contempt that he understood the consent judgment he had signed and the nature and extent of plaintiff's business which he used to run. And three more—that the trial court never had jurisdiction over him, consequently the consent judgment is void, and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.