1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 529 So.2d
  5. 529 So.2d 267 (1988)
 

DOHNAL v. SYNDICATED OFFICES SYSTEMS

No. 70682.

529 So.2d 267 (1988)

Linda Susan DOHNAL and Robert Louis Dohnal, As Personal Representatives of the Estate of Susanne Dohnal, Deceased, Petitioners, v. SYNDICATED OFFICES SYSTEMS, d/b/a Central Financial Control and Palms of Pasadena Hospital, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied August 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marian B. Rush of Harris, Barrett, Mann & Dew, St. Petersburg, and W. Langston Holland, St. Petersburg, for petitioners.

Paul W. Hitchens, St. Petersburg, for respondents.

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Dohnal v. Syndicated Offices Systems, 506 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), in which the district court certified the following as a question of great public importance:

DOES CLERICAL ERROR, SUCH AS IN THE INSTANT CASE, SHOW GOOD CAUSE JUSTIFYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 733.705(3), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1984), WHERE THE ESTATE HAS SHOWN NO PREJUDICE....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases