HICKMAN, Justice.
The question in this case is whether the trial court was wrong in denying the appellant's motion for a new trial. We conclude the motion should have been denied because it was untimely. The trial judge should have summarily denied the motion under ARCP Rule 59(b).
On November 23, 1987, the appellant got a $3,100 personal injury judgment. The appellant filed a motion for a new trial on November 25, 1987, contending the amount was in error...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.