1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 368 S.E.2d
  5. 368 S.E.2d 422 (1988)
 

PIEPER v. PIEPER

No. 8726DC1110.

368 S.E.2d 422 (1988)

Loris M. PIEPER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Gary L. PIEPER, Respondent/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen., T. Byron Smith, Raleigh, for petitioner/appellant.

Petree Stockton & Robinson by Peter E. Lane and David B. Hamilton, Charlotte, for respondent/appellee.

WELLS, Judge.

The question is whether petitioner may use URESA as a vehicle to enforce in our State a foreign support decree which could not have been rendered under North Carolina law. The district court made, inter alia, the following findings of fact:

1. Mr. Pieper has been a resident of North Carolina since 1975. 2. Mr. and Mrs. Pieper entered no agreement for the payment of support for their son beyond the age of eighteen years.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases