1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 754 P.2d
  5. 754 P.2d 22 (1988)
 

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. LCDC

84-ACK-388; CA A35098.

754 P.2d 22 (1988)

91 Or.App. 138

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, Middle Fork Irrigation District and Parkdale Water Company, Petitioners, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND HOOD RIVER COUNTY, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 11, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Benner, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Michael Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Com'n. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Jeff Bennett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for respondent Hood River County.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

DEITS, Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LCDC's acknowledgment of Hood River County's comprehensive plan and land use regulations. All of their assignments are directed at LCDC's approval of the county's application of Goal 5 and OAR 660-16-010 to the Parkdale Lava Beds and the nearby springs and aquifer and of the zoning of that area to permit aggregate mining and processing as a conditional use. We reverse.

The issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases