UNLIMITED v. KITSAP COUNTY

No. 11308-2-II.

50 Wn. App. 723 (1988)

750 P.2d 651

UNLIMITED, ET AL, Appellants, v. KITSAP COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

March 4, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel H. Paget, Craig E. Schuman, and Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland, for appellants.

C. Danny Clem, Prosecuting Attorney for Kitsap County, and Reinhold P. Schuetz, Deputy, for respondent Kitsap County.

John F. Mitchell, Anna M. Laurie, and Sanchez, Paulson, Mitchell & Laurie, for respondents Berg, et al.


WORSWICK, J.

This litigation arose out of the exaction by Kitsap County, without compensation, of two property interests as conditions for its issuance of a planned unit development permit. The owners of the proposed development, who style themselves as "Unlimited," challenged these exactions in superior court, and now appeal that court's dismissal by summary judgment of their petition for a writ of certiorari and their related complaint for declaratory relief and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases